top of page

Does Your Myers Briggs Type Predict How Far You’ll Climb?


Since the 1960’s, when Isabel Briggs Myers introduced her MBTI®1 personality type

assessment, career advisors have been interested in using personality type to coach their

clients to success. Much research has been done to examine career trends among types;

studies have looked at the prevalence of the 16 types in a wide range of occupations and

found marked differences in the careers that people of different personality types choose for

themselves.2 Career advisors now have a broad body of information to guide clients in

selecting satisfying careers.

However, research into more general career outcomes among the 16 personality types is

somewhat more sparse. Are certain types more likely to earn more, or progress to higher

rungs on the corporate ladder? Are some types more satisfied with their work, regardless of

the occupation they choose? Are some types more likely to choose alternatives to full-time

work, for example self-employment or stay-at-home parenting?

A survey conducted by CPP, Inc., publisher of the MBTI® instrument, yielded some suggestive

data on the topic. In the MBTI Manual, CPP researchers reported that a national survey

revealed a clear income differential between types, with ENTJs earning the highest average

income and ISFPs the lowest. They also reported differences in overall job satisfaction, with

Extraverted and Judging types reporting higher levels of satisfaction.3 While these details are

interesting, the Manual includes only selected findings from the study, and a full report of the

results does not appear to be readily available.

Similarly, an infographic4 illustrating average incomes for each of the personality types

recently received wide attention in online media. Although the information presented

aroused considerable interest, its reliability is questionable. The source of the data was not

made explicit by the publisher of the graphic, and it is not clear how the sample was

collected, how large it was, and how it was analyzed. Page  2 of  30

1 MBTI is a registered trademark of the Myers & Briggs Foundation, Inc., which is not affiliated with this study.

2 Schaubhut & Thompson, 2008.

3 Myers, McCauley, Quenk, & Hammer, 2003.

4 See

While data on career outcomes among the types is scant, assumptions are rampant.

Descriptions of the 16 personality types typically include many claims about the various

types’ predisposition to particular career paths. Some types are described as being especially

ambitious and inclined to leadership (i.e. ENTJ and ESTJ), others 5 are described as

entrepreneurial (ENTPs especially),6 while still others are described as particularly nurturing

and focused on the task of parenting (i.e. ESFJs).7 These portrayals are rarely, if ever,

supported by specific data; rather, they are proposed and accepted as self-evident. However,

if these descriptions of various types are valid, then they should not be difficult to verify

through an analysis of relevant career trends among the types.

Our goal in this study was to do a comprehensive analysis of various career outcomes among

the 16 personality types and examine what differences, if any, exist between types. Where

our survey replicated existing research, our intent was to do a more complete analysis of the

relevant phenomena and make the full results of the study freely available to the public.

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page